- clarifying how Canada Pension Plan and Quebec Pension Plan disability benefits interact with WCB benefits
- removing outdated language around chronic pain while confirming chronic pain remains a compensable injury
- converting annuity payments to lump sums at age 65 to reflect current practice
- simplifying fatality reporting by removing duplicate requirements for hospitals
- lifting restrictions on funding for workplace safety research and prevention programs.
New obligations and tools for employers
Employers will see both new responsibilities and some important advantages. Under the amended Act, employers will be required to report workplace injuries within two days instead of five, with the goal of improving timely access to benefits and speeding up return‑to‑work planning.
At the same time, employers will gain better access to information that helps them accommodate injured workers as employers will be given functional ability information — for example, lifting restrictions — so they can offer safe modified duties. The WCB stresses that only information necessary for safe accommodation will be shared, to protect worker privacy while improving return‑to‑work outcomes.
The cost structure of claims is also changing in employers’ favour in at least one respect. WCB Nova Scotia notes that transportation expenses to get an injured worker to care, such as ambulance services, will now be treated as part of overall claims costs rather than a separate bill for employers. The Board describes this as “one less thing to think about during an already stressful time,” suggesting an effort to simplify administration for businesses at the moment a serious injury occurs.
Regulatory transparency and ongoing benefit reviews form another piece of the reform package. WCB Nova Scotia says it will have the option to publish the names of employers who receive administrative penalties, a move intended to encourage compliance and reassure workers that enforcement is taken seriously. The Board also notes that Extended Earnings Replacement Benefits can now be revisited when a worker’s circumstances change, instead of waiting for the standard three‑year or five‑year review intervals, which is meant to make the system more responsive and fair for both workers and employers.